Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Howell's avatar

As above I feel that the board have acted due to the (sometimes over the top) reaction of a section of our fanbase.

Weve won 13 points out of 18 achieved since "the announcement", is Connell Rawlinson going to better that? Its the correct decision, made in an erratic manner.

Upwards and onwards, hopefully we get play offs and give Phil Parkinson a go in the Conference. #utfs

Ian Dutton's avatar

I think Callum deserved better support from the Board. They have given in too easily to toxic opinions. If I thought they had a plan to put in place I’d be happier, but I don’t think they have. Are they expecting an interim solution/manager to get the team into the play offs? Then why sack him?

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?